2
one thing that people gotta stop doing is treating it like every intermediate version of an idea has to actually work, do you know how far you can get if you allow your idea to exist with superpositions throughout it's development? so many paths you don't have access to otherwise
you can imagine a threshold in concept-space which separates "works" from "doesn't". the thing is there are less things that work than (things that dont work + things that work). utilizing the entirety of concept-space allows you to find smoother paths to your destination
the "works" portion of concept space is likely very jagged on the edges as we have some really strict rules within reality which are absolutely SURROUNDED with points in concept space which do not work but are similar
the only problem is projecting that there is an island of stability, which you can't exactly know for sure but can make good guesses on based on symbolic dynamics between your components (this is where you have to get weird) (this requires an intuition of the problem-space)
my process involves diffusing the island of stability out of otherwise seemingly random environmental signals making only the relevant connections to bring my unconscious understanding of the problem space to a conscious understanding, aka
take an edible and just walk around LOL
island of stability is a borrowed term because i am very interested in the island of superheavy likely-possible elements
the dimensions in that space being neutrons, protons, and half-life, the dimensions in concept space being a theoretical possible representative dimensions within the human brain, in which bounds describe ideas or concepts, im not sure if thats perfectly clear to every reader
the link being that you have to go past and through elements with very very low half-lives, very unstable elements, this is analogous to "ideas that dont work" or "ideas that dont work very well or are unrealistic" which you would path through
the difference being concept space is much higher dimensional and allows for very complex mixtures of saddles peaks and troughs in "workingness"
1
u gotta be using drugs strategically and ritualistically as conscious state modifiers for solving problems but it requires you to be a little bit psychotic
u actually gotta be using everything this way
you can decide how your internal state will be modified consciously by deciding what stimuli to expose yourself to and i dont think people do much besides let the algorithm guide them on very smooth conceptual paths opposed to the variance you can get by consciously designing your "media consumption experience"
